As of 2018, forensic science has now reached a point where modern technologies, such as genetic genealogy, allow investigators to solve crimes that have remained unsolved for decades. Genetic genealogy, a recent development in forensic science, combines DNA analysis with genealogical research to identify suspects by tracing familial connections. This technique gained widespread attention in 2018 when it was used to identify and arrest the Golden State Killer, a serial rapist and murderer who had evaded capture for over 40 years. By uploading DNA from crime scenes to public genealogy databases, investigators were able to trace the suspect’s family tree and ultimately identify him. Other famous cases involving Genetic Genealogy include the Idaho murders of 2022 and the Phoenix Canal Killings.
Despite its progress, forensic science still faces significant challenges. One of the most significant issues in forensic science today is the potential for human error and bias. For example, forensic techniques like fingerprint analysis, though widely accepted, are not infallible. Studies have shown that different examiners can sometimes reach different conclusions when analyzing the same set of fingerprints, leading to possible misidentifications. Similarly, the interpretation of forensic evidence, such as bite marks or hair samples, has been called into question due to the subjective nature of the analysis and the lack of standardized methods across different laboratories.
Another concern is the misuse or over-reliance on forensic evidence in the courtroom. In some cases, juries and judges may place undue weight on forensic evidence, assuming it to be irrefutable, even when the science behind it is still evolving or contested. This misuse has led to wrongful convictions, as seen in cases where individuals were exonerated after spending years in prison due to flawed forensic testimony. The case of Keith Harward, wrongfully convicted based on faulty bite mark evidence and later exonerated through DNA testing, highlights the potential dangers of relying on unproven forensic methods.
While the flaws and challenges within modern forensic science are undeniable, it is essential to recognize that the advancements in this field have significantly improved law enforcement’s ability to solve crimes and bring perpetrators to justice.
Comments